Skip navigation
Annenberg School of Communication and Journalism University of Southern California
Nation/World

Student Loan Debt Tops $1 Trillion, Prompts Federal Reform

For most students, it's a necessary evil: loans.

For most students, it's a necessary evil: loans.

About 60 percent of the 20 million Americans who attend college each year must take out loans, according to the Chronicle of Higher Education. After decades of borrowing, student loan debt has swelled to a trillion dollars.

"I'm scared about graduating and how I'm going to pay for them," admits Shalea Klepner. 

A reform of the Higher Education Act could give students more payment options, and on Thursday, U.S. Senators held their eighth hearing to discuss changes to the bill. 

What's motivating much of the discussion at the federal level is equality of access to higher education. 

"If you are a high-income, low-performing student, you have an 80 percent chance of going to college. If you're a low-income, high-performing student, your chances of going to college are only 20 percent," said Iowa Democrat, Sen. Tom Harkin. "That needs to be corrected."

Despite the seemingly insurmountable debt incurred during college, many students say the rewards of education outweigh the risks.

"I think its like an investment and I'll have to pay that money," said USC senior Christina Burcelis. "But in the end, I think it's going to benefit me instead of going to a smaller school."

COMMENTS

The trouble is that young people have no idea of how hard it is to repay $100,000. The drag on their quality of life during the repayment years is beyond their comprehension.

The trouble with the system is that the availability of loans has allowed educational institutions to raise the costs to the student. It was much easier when I emerged from school in the sixties to pay off my low-interest government loan. Schools hadn't yet learned how to gouge the customer.

You are wrong Christina Burcelis. Just because you pay more money to attend a big school than paying a far lower amount to attend a smaller school doesn't set your future up for greater success. Oh yeah, isn't this article about debt? So paying less to attend a smaller school is the message that should be portrayed here!!!
"I think its like an investment and I'll have to pay that money," said USC senior Christina Burcelis. "But in the end, I think it's going to benefit me instead of going to a smaller school."
.

Learn to read. No one said going to a smaller school does not make you more or less successful. Howver going to one of the top universities definitely assits in helping you succeed. you will see they ask do you think going to a bigger school is better? I do believe in fact with a bigger school you have a bigger network which in turn does help when looking for a job. Going to a larger school is an investment, time, effort and cost ( which can be debt)

The trouble is that young people have no idea of how hard it is to repay $100,000. The drag on their quality of life during the repayment years is beyond their comprehension.

The trouble with the system is that the availability of loans has allowed educational institutions to raise the costs to the student. It was much easier when I emerged from school in the sixties to pay off my low-interest government loan. Schools hadn't yet learned how to gouge the customer.

The US govt continuously states that we are behind other countries, when it comes to education. Britain, Germany, and others in the G-8 countries offer free education up to a bachelorett degree. The only way for our kids to compete with these countries, and keep jobs here in the US, is for them to put themselves in debt with student loans.

The rich will claim that not everybody should have a college education, since this will make those wealthy families wealthier, and the poor would stay poor. It is a page right out of Machiavelli's "The Prince."

The only way for the govt to get more tax revenue, and push education, is to offer free education ad they do in almost all of the industrial worlds. The initial investment into paying for a bachelor's degree would be offset with interest in taxes collected from the higher salaries.

The short of it is that if the US wants to compete globally with technologies and sciences, then they will have to join the rest of civilized countries and offer the same education that the other countries offer.

the world needs ditch diggers

The Federal Student Loan program has allowed Colleges and Universities to raise cost without the fear of losing students. It's a double edged sword but I would prefer public universities to have to justify increases in tuition instead of just passing them along through increased student debt.

The answer is simple. Give a couple of hundred billion to Goldman Sachs and offset it by not letting students declare bankruptcy. Oops. We've already done that.

Man people c'mon if you borrow money on a loan, pay the stupid thing back and be honest.I am finally going to pay off my loan and be done with it. It's better though to pay for school yourself before borrowing money that isn't yours.

I don't think that you get the concept of borrowing money. The minute that you get the money, it is yours. You bought it for a fee and an obligation to pay back the principle along with the fee.

Leave a comment
Name:
E-mail:*
URL:
Comments:*

We've Moved!


By Sam Bergum
01/21/16 | 11:09 a.m. PST

Visit us at uscannenbergmedia.com!

USC Basketball Knocks Off Rival UCLA 89- 75


By Scott Cook
01/14/16 | 12:05 a.m. PST

USC defeats UCLA with stellar play from their Freshmen. 

Holiday Bowl - USC vs Wisconsin Post-Game Press Conference

Su'a Cravens: "It's the players that need to step up"

Darreus Rogers: "It comes down to the players"

Trojans Fall to Wisconsin in the Holiday Bowl 23-21

We detected that you might be on a mobile device such as an iPad or iPhone. Sorry, at this time the video box is only visible on desktop computers.